I think this is better than 488 GTB

Kinja'd!!! "Frank Grimes" (FrankGrimes)
04/21/2015 at 02:26 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!1 Kinja'd!!! 8
Kinja'd!!!

DISCUSSION (8)


Kinja'd!!! Axial > Frank Grimes
04/21/2015 at 02:34

Kinja'd!!!3

The California T is infinitely prettier than that god-awful 488 GTB.


Kinja'd!!! E. Julius > Frank Grimes
04/21/2015 at 03:50

Kinja'd!!!0

Mmmm, convertible.


Kinja'd!!! samssun > Frank Grimes
04/21/2015 at 04:31

Kinja'd!!!1

The 488’s design may be busy, but on no planet does a front-engined, 550 horse, 3600 pound cruiser best a mid-engined, 660 horse, 3200 pound spiritual successor to the 288 GTO. It runs a 10.4 quarter mile stock!

And, as with the C7, a darker color mutes some of the visual noise:

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! Milky > samssun
04/21/2015 at 09:19

Kinja'd!!!0

10.4 quarter mile?! I’ll believe it when someone besides Ferrari says it.


Kinja'd!!! samssun > Milky
04/21/2015 at 19:06

Kinja'd!!!0

It’s reasonable and a couple of online calculators put it in the 10.4-10.5 range (used 3250 lbs, 660 bhp, 560 whp). Z06 did 11.0 with almost 300 extra pounds and the engine in front, so it’s in the ballpark.


Kinja'd!!! William Byrd > Frank Grimes
04/22/2015 at 15:27

Kinja'd!!!0

Grimey, you’re crazy. I love you, but you’re crazy.


Kinja'd!!! Frank Grimes > William Byrd
04/22/2015 at 15:46

Kinja'd!!!1

its probably true.

maybe it was just a passing mood but the front engine cruiser vibe of the california and its more subdued looks and possible comfort and convertibleness made more sense at the time.


Kinja'd!!! William Byrd > Frank Grimes
04/22/2015 at 15:48

Kinja'd!!!0

I dig the CA from the angle posted. The rear still throws me off. It’s kind of big and lumpy. I normally don’t mind that (ifyouknowwhatImean) but in this case, it’s a bit weird.